🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be slashed by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.