🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast it to what average American pays. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like much of federal military, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Maybe one positive aspect in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.