🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."